Electrical PPM Services for HRB UK – EICR & Safety Case Integration

Electrical PPM that regulators can follow and challenge

If you are responsible for a higher-risk residential building, “in-date” EICRs and green dashboards are no longer enough. Regulators expect you to show how electrical risks are identified, controlled and reviewed over time, not just that tests were booked.

This approach treats electrical PPM as part of your Safety Management System, aligning policies, EICRs, remedials and records so you can explain decisions with confidence. By defining scope, responsibilities and Plan–Do–Check–Act loops, you create a regime that stands up in front of a regulator, insurer or coroner.

• Clarify which electrical systems you actually control and maintain
• Turn fragmented EICR records into traceable risk and action trails
• Embed electrical checks into a visible Plan–Do–Check–Act loop

---

---

---

Electrical PPM for HRBs that Stand Up in Front of the Regulator

Your electrical PPM for a higher‑risk building is only regulator‑ready when you can explain the regime clearly, show the evidence quickly and defend decisions calmly. It has to join up law, standards, EICRs, day‑to‑day maintenance and Safety Case arguments, so you can show how electrical risks are identified, controlled and reviewed over time, not just that certificates are “in date”. When All Services 4U helps you design this regime, the focus is always on what you will be able to put in front of a regulator, insurer or coroner, not just what gets ticked off on site.

What “maintain to prevent danger” really means in an HRB

In higher‑risk buildings, “maintain to prevent danger” means your landlord‑controlled electrical systems are designed, inspected and repaired in a way you can justify, not just “we’ve always done it like this”. You are expected to know where electrical risks sit, how often they are being checked and how quickly serious issues are resolved, not just that tests are booked on a calendar or that a diary reminder exists.

For higher‑risk residential buildings, the familiar duty to “maintain to prevent danger” now sits inside a more demanding context. You are expected to:

• Show that landlord‑controlled systems follow recognised standards such as BS 7671 for fixed installations.
• Demonstrate that inspection and testing are risk‑based, not just calendar‑driven.
• Evidence that findings lead to timely action, not just new paperwork.

Taken together, these expectations shift electrical work from “jobs completed” to “risks understood and controlled over time”.

In practice, that means having a clearly documented electrical policy for your HRBs that:

• States which laws and standards it relies on, such as Electricity at Work Regulations and the Building Safety Act regime.
• Describes what “safe” looks like for your installations in everyday language.
• Sets expectations for inspection, testing, maintenance and documentation your teams can actually follow.

This page is information only and is not legal advice; any decisions about compliance should be taken with competent professional input. The aim is to help you see what a credible regime looks like in operational, not just legal, terms.

Defining scope and responsibilities in your electrical regime

Scope and responsibilities are clear when anyone can see, for each HRB, which systems the landlord controls, which sit with residents or commercial occupiers and where utility ownership starts and ends. A regulator‑ready policy starts by drawing these clean lines so everyone knows which systems they control and which they do not, without needing a long explanation or a forensic email dig.

That scope should answer, in plain terms:

• What is in scope?: Landlord‑controlled fixed electrical systems, including intake, switchgear, risers, landlord distribution boards, sub‑mains and final circuits serving common parts and life‑safety systems, plus supplies to lifts, smoke control, emergency lighting, plant rooms and landlord areas.
• What is out of scope, but still relevant?: Resident installations, commercial demises and utility‑owned equipment. These may not be yours to maintain, but they still need to be recognised in risk assessments and Safety Case arguments.

For each HRB, you should be able to point to a simple register that says:

• Which systems and locations are landlord responsibilities.
• Which belong to leaseholders, commercial tenants or utilities.
• Where interfaces exist, such as metre rooms, lateral mains and shared risers.

This register means you can show, quickly, who is accountable for any given defect and avoid dangerous “grey areas”. All Services 4U designs electrical PPM regimes so that these boundaries are explicit from day one, reducing disputes and hidden gaps when you need to evidence control.

Embedding electrical PPM into your Safety Management System

For the Building Safety Regulator, electrical PPM is one of the control loops inside your wider Safety Management System, not a stand‑alone activity. Electrical PPM supports your Safety Case when it follows the same Plan–Do–Check–Act discipline you apply to fire and structural risks, so regulators see not just tasks completed, but a clear loop that plans work, delivers it, checks performance and acts on what is learned across each HRB.

A simple way to frame this is:

• Plan: documented policies, risk assessments, EICR and PPM schedules, roles and competence criteria.
• Do: delivery of inspections, tests, maintenance and remedials to an agreed standard.
• Check: monitoring of completion rates, findings, close‑out performance, incidents and near‑misses.
• Act: corrective and preventive actions, specification changes, updated procedures and training.

A good test is whether you could explain, in a meeting, how an EICR observation moves from “found” to “fixed and verified”, and how that journey is visible in your risk register and Safety Case. If your current answer is “it depends who picked up the email”, your regime is probably not yet regulator‑ready.

Electrical safety in an HRB is not a project; it is an evidence‑backed storey you must be ready to tell at any time.

Once you have a clear system view, it becomes much easier to see where current contractors and processes are falling short.

---

The Hidden Risk in HRB Electrical Compliance

The uncomfortable truth is that hidden electrical risks in HRBs often sit behind apparently “compliant” paperwork. You may see EICRs logged as in date and no overdue actions on dashboards, but still have unsatisfactory reports, missed assets and unresolved high‑risk items. “In‑date” status, apparent action closure and green status lights can mask serious issues when records are fragmented and responsibilities are blurred across landlord, leaseholder and utility boundaries.

Fragmented records and misleading “in‑date” status

When electrical records sit in different formats and systems, an apparently “in‑date” position can hide serious weaknesses. Fragmented records create a false sense of security by turning complex electrical risk into a single tick, even though you may have certificates with unsatisfactory outcomes, missing distribution boards and remedial work that was never done or never evidenced. From a regulator’s perspective, that means you cannot reliably show the current electrical position of an HRB.

Most Accountable Persons and asset teams inherit a patchwork of:

• PDFs sitting on shared drives and in email chains.
• EICR reports in different templates and coding conventions.
• Remedial quotes and invoices not clearly linked back to specific observations.
• CAFM records that show jobs as “closed” without attached evidence.

In that environment, a simple question like “show me the current electrical position for this HRB” turns into a multi‑day exercise. The risk is clear:

• An “in‑date” EICR may actually be an unsatisfactory report with open C1, C2 or FI items.
• Key distribution boards or risers may have been omitted entirely.
• Life‑safety circuits may not be clearly identified, let alone prioritised.

Taken together, these gaps mean a date‑driven view can seriously understate live electrical risk. A regulator, insurer or coroner will not be reassured by a schedule of test dates alone; they will look for a coherent storey: what was found, what was done, who signed it off and how recurrence is being prevented.

Grey areas between landlord, leaseholder and utility

Grey areas in responsibility are another common source of hidden risk. Responsibility grey areas hide defects because nobody feels fully accountable for borderline assets. If it is not clear who owns or maintains particular cables, boards or risers, defects can sit unresolved while different parties argue. In an HRB context, that ambiguity can leave you trying to defend risks that are technically outside your control, or worse, assuming someone else is dealing with them when nobody is.

Higher‑risk buildings often have complex ownership and responsibility splits:

• Leaseholder‑owned lateral mains sitting inside common risers.
• Commercial units whose supplies and containment intersect with residential areas.
• Metre rooms where boundary lines between DNO, landlord and leaseholder are unclear.

If those boundaries are not documented and agreed, you can end up with:

• Defects found in “nobody’s” equipment.
• Safety Case arguments that assume control where you have none.
• Disputes at the exact moment you need decisive action, for example after an incident.

A structured PPM regime, such as the one delivered by All Services 4U, starts with this mapping exercise so that every EICR and remedial plan reflects real responsibilities, not hopeful assumptions.

Portfolio blind spots that surface at the worst time

Portfolio blind spots arise when each building is managed in isolation and nobody is looking across the whole HRB estate. Recurring defects, access failures or weak contractor performance then stay below the radar until a major review, Safety Case submission or incident forces everything into the open at once, often when you have least time to respond.

Individually, each building may appear manageable; at portfolio level, patterns tell a different storey:

• The same type of defect reappearing across many HRBs, such as overheated terminations on particular boards.
• Persistent access failures in certain blocks leading to incomplete testing.
• Consistent under‑recording of defects in specific contractor territories.

Until you look across your HRBs as a whole, it is easy to miss systemic risks and under‑estimate the scale of remedial investment required. When you are preparing a Safety Case or facing a regulator inspection, those blind spots can quickly become the focus of uncomfortable questions.

Once hidden risks are visible, the next step is to define what “good” looks like and give your teams something concrete to work towards.

---

What Compliant Electrical PPM Looks Like Under the Building Safety Act

Under the Building Safety Act, compliant electrical PPM for HRBs is a documented, repeatable way of managing risk that a competent person can recognise as aligned with law and standards and that your organisation can actually deliver. It is not just an EICR schedule; it is a structured way of working that explains which assets are covered, what is done to them, how often, how findings are handled and how performance is monitored, backed by clear evidence outputs and KPIs your board and the Regulator can understand.

Building an HRB‑specific electrical standard

An HRB‑specific electrical standard translates abstract legal duties into concrete expectations for your buildings. It turns general requirements into a clear rulebook that states which installations it covers, which laws and standards it relies on, how electrical risk links to fire and structural safety, and what “good” looks like in everyday language for your teams and contractors.

Instead of relying on generic corporate wording, an HRB electrical standard should:

• State the buildings it applies to, for example all registered higher‑risk residential buildings in England.
• Reference the core instruments it draws on, such as the Building Safety Act regime, Electricity at Work Regulations, the current edition of BS 7671 and fire‑safety guidance for residential buildings.
• Explain, in plain language, how electrical risk contributes to fire and structural safety, and how the PPM regime controls that risk.

From there, you can set out:

• Which assets must have periodic inspection and testing.
• How often, as a starting point, those tasks should occur.
• How risk assessments may justify more or less frequent attention, with clear criteria and sign‑off routes.

All Services 4U can help you redraft or create this standard so that it is both technically sound and practical for your organisation.

Creating a practical electrical task matrix

A practical electrical task matrix takes the standard off the page and into day‑to‑day work. It lists your key assets, the tasks applied to each, the intervals and any special triggers, so you can drive CAFM schedules, contractor scopes and Safety Case evidence from a single, consistent source.

A useful way to think about PPM is as a matrix that lists:

• Assets and systems: such as main LV intake, risers, landlord boards, smoke‑control supplies, emergency lighting circuits, lifts and plant controls.
• Tasks: such as periodic EICR, RCD testing, visual and mechanical checks, thermal imaging where justified and functional checks of interlocks and changeover.
• Intervals: such as five‑year EICR baselines adjusted by risk, more frequent checks for critical boards and regular functional checks for key devices.
• Trigger events: such as post‑incident inspections or after major refurbishment.

This matrix becomes the backbone of:

• PPM schedules in your CAFM system.
• Specifications and scopes for All Services 4U and other contractors.
• Evidence listings in your Safety Case and golden thread.

Defining evidence outputs and KPIs that matter

Evidence outputs and KPIs matter because they turn electrical activity into trackable assurance. When you define in advance which documents, photos and data each task must produce, where they live and how long you keep them, you can answer questions about control, backlog and trends with facts rather than estimates.

For every task in the matrix, you should define:

• What evidence must exist, such as test sheets, certificates, photographs, updated schematics and sign‑off records.
• Where it will be stored, for example within a named golden thread repository linked to asset IDs and dates.
• How long it must be retained.

Alongside this, meaningful KPIs for electrical safety in HRBs might include:

• Percentage of HRBs with current, satisfactory landlord EICRs.
• Average and maximum close‑out times for C1, C2 and FI observations.
• Trend in remedial backlog and repeat defects by building and system.
• Access success rates for planned inspections.

These metrics then form part of your board reports and Safety Case arguments, showing that you are not simply doing tasks, but monitoring their effect on risk.

Once your standard and task matrix are defined, the next question is how often you should test and how you justify those intervals.

---

Designing Risk‑Based EICR Cycles for Higher‑Risk Buildings

Designing risk‑based EICR cycles for HRBs means stepping beyond a flat “five‑yearly for everything” approach and explaining why particular installations are tested when they are. Risk‑based EICR cycles use building characteristics, resident vulnerability and installation history to shape inspection intervals and scope, so your programme is proportionate, coordinated with other intrusive checks and defensible.

Periodic inspection and testing remains central to electrical safety, but in the Building Safety Act environment “we do five‑year EICRs everywhere” is no longer an adequate answer. A more mature approach uses risk to shape EICR intervals, scope and coordination.

Stratifying HRBs to justify inspection intervals

Stratifying HRBs involves grouping similar buildings and setting inspection intervals that match their risk profile. Instead of applying the same interval to every building, you can categorise HRBs using factors such as:

• Height and complexity, for example taller towers with extensive plant rooms and risers.
• Resident vulnerability, for example specialist housing or sheltered schemes.
• Age and design of electrical installation.
• History of defects, incidents and near‑misses.
• Fire strategy and dependency of life‑safety systems on electrical supplies.

For each category, you can then set:

• Baseline inspection intervals, which may still be around five years for some landlord areas but shorter for others.
• Conditions under which intervals are shortened, such as recurring C2s, significant alterations or change of use.
• Conditions under which they may be justified as longer, with clear reasoning and approvals.

All Services 4U can support this analysis, bringing experience from other HRB portfolios to help you keep intervals conservative where they need to be.

Coordinating EICRs with other intrusive checks

Coordinating EICRs with other intrusive checks reduces disruption for residents and improves testing completeness. By planning work by riser or plant area and stacking multiple tasks into the same access window, you make better use of shutdowns and reduce the chance that critical circuits are missed.

In a live high‑rise building, access is precious. Residents are understandably weary of repeated visits and outages. A coordinated approach:

• Groups EICR work with intrusive fire‑safety checks, lift inspections or ventilation tests by riser or plant area.
• Plans shutdowns and access windows with clear resident communication.
• Sequences work so that critical services remain available as far as reasonably practicable.

This alignment reduces the number of separate disruptions to residents, the risk of incomplete testing because doors or risers could not be accessed and the administrative overhead for your teams.

Feeding EICR results into capital and risk planning

Using EICR results in capital and risk planning turns inspection reports into strategic data. EICRs are more than pass/fail documents; when you look across multiple HRBs, recurring defects, limitations and ageing equipment point towards where you need to invest, where design changes are required and where inspection intensity should increase.

EICRs, used properly, can:

• Highlight where distribution equipment is approaching the end of its life, supporting capital bids.
• Reveal design shortcomings, such as recurring overloading, that require engineering solutions, not just remedials.
• Indicate buildings where electrical risk is drifting upwards and inspection intensity should increase.

Rather than treating each report in isolation, a risk‑based regime, supported by a partner such as All Services 4U, extracts these insights across your HRBs to inform strategic decisions.

Once your EICR cycles are risk‑based and coordinated, the next challenge is turning that stream of data into evidence your Safety Case can rely on.

---

---

Turning EICR & PPM Data into Safety Case Evidence

Turning EICR and PPM data into Safety Case evidence means structuring it so that claims about electrical safety can be backed by specific, traceable records. EICR and PPM data become Safety Case evidence when they are standardised, traceable and clearly linked to the claims you are making about electrical safety, so for every HRB you can show what you say is safe, how your regime supports that statement and which specific records prove it, without days of manual hunting.

The Building Safety Regulator is not asking for more paperwork; it is asking for clearer reasoning supported by trustworthy evidence. Electrical inspection and maintenance records are a major part of that evidence, but only if they are structured correctly.

Standardising data so it flows into the golden thread

Standardising data ensures that EICR and PPM outputs move smoothly from contractor tools into your golden thread and Safety Case files. Standardised data lets those outputs flow from engineers’ reports into your systems with minimal friction: consistent asset IDs, locations, codes and formats mean you can answer questions about specific systems quickly and reuse information across Safety Case sections without retyping or re‑labelling.

To reuse electrical records as Safety Case evidence, they must be:

• Consistently labelled: asset IDs, circuit references, locations and system names must match your asset register and drawings.
• Structured: key fields, such as observation codes, dates, inspectors, remedial references and outcomes, should be captured as data, not only as free text.
• Traceable: it must be possible to follow a line from a Safety Case claim, such as “smoke control supplies are maintained and inspected”, to specific EICRs, test results and remedial records.

All Services 4U issues EICR and PPM outputs in formats that are ready to be ingested into common golden thread platforms and document management systems, reducing manual rework and making your electrical evidence easier to interrogate.

Building clear claims–arguments–evidence links

Clear claims–arguments–evidence links reveal whether your Safety Case is genuinely supported by electrical records. Claims–arguments–evidence thinking helps you state exactly what you are asserting about electrical safety, how your PPM regime underpins that claim and exactly which EICRs, logs and remedial certificates you rely on, so any gaps are exposed before inspection.

For each critical electrical system, your Safety Case should be able to answer three questions:

• Claim: what are you asserting, for example, “The landlord’s fixed electrical installation does not present an intolerable fire or shock risk.”
• Argument: how do PPM and EICR activities support that claim, for example, “We follow a documented inspection and maintenance regime aligned with recognised standards, and we treat serious observations through a closed‑loop process.”
• Evidence: which records back this up, for example, “Here are the EICR reports, observation logs, remedial certificates and verification records for the last cycle.”

If you cannot quickly bring those elements together, it is a sign your current documentation is not yet Safety Case‑ready.

Using dashboards and audits to keep evidence alive

Dashboards and audits keep electrical evidence “alive” by making its health visible every month, not just at submission time. They show where EICR cycles are slipping, remedial backlogs are building or records are missing, so you can act early and keep your Safety Case position credible rather than relying on a one‑off tidy‑up exercise.

Evidence is only persuasive if it is current. That means:

• Setting a defined refresh cycle for electrical evidence packs per HRB, such as yearly summaries that roll up test results, defects and close‑out status.
• Sampling evidence as part of internal audit or independent reviews.
• Using dashboards that show, at a glance, where electrical risk or evidence quality is drifting.

With this approach, you avoid the scramble of assembling a one‑off pack for the Regulator; instead, you maintain a living set of records that can be presented at any time.

Once you have this evidential backbone in place, the question becomes who delivers the day‑to‑day work and how joined‑up their service model is.

---

Our Electrical PPM & EICR Service Model for HRBs

All Services 4U provides an electrical PPM and EICR service model that is built specifically for HRBs, combining competent engineers, HRB‑specific awareness, integrated delivery from inspection to remedials and documentation that drops straight into your Safety Case. The aim is to act as your electrical risk partner, not just another testing supplier, so you can trust the whole chain from observation to evidence.

HRB‑competent teams and clear scopes

Electrical work in higher‑risk buildings demands teams who understand how electrical systems in tall residential blocks interact with life‑safety measures and residents’ lives and who operate to clear scopes. HRB‑competent teams and precise scopes ensure they work on the right assets, at the right time, with the right methods, so every visit moves you closer to a defensible Safety Case position rather than just another certificate.

Electrical work in higher‑risk buildings demands:

• Engineers who understand the practical realities of working in tall, occupied residential buildings.
• Familiarity with how electrical systems interact with fire strategies and life‑safety equipment.
• Sensitivity to resident access, vulnerability and disruption.

All Services 4U fields teams whose competence is assessed against recognised benchmarks, with HRB‑specific training layered on top. Scopes of work:

• Are written to reflect HRB realities, including landlord and leaseholder boundaries.
• Cover EICR, planned maintenance tasks and associated remedials.
• Explicitly link tasks to Safety Case and golden thread needs, not just test dates.

Integrated delivery: from inspection to evidence pack

Integrated delivery means you do not need to reconcile conflicting outputs from several suppliers to build a coherent storey. Instead of appointing one contractor for EICRs, another for remedials and a third to tidy up documentation, one service manages inspections, PPM tasks, remedials and documentation, giving you a single line from each observation through to its resolution and evidence.

Our model delivers:

• EICRs and fixed installation testing: to agreed, risk‑based programmes.
• Routine PPM tasks: such as RCD testing, distribution board checks and, where justified by risk, thermal imaging.
• Remedial works: planned and delivered in a way that is traceable to the original findings.
• Logbook and document updates: so that asset registers, drawings and golden thread entries stay in step with the physical installation.

The output is not just a stack of reports; it is a structured evidence pack that can be lifted straight into your Safety Case file set.

When every inspection, defect and repair is captured in a consistent way, the burden of proving control shrinks dramatically.

After this integrated cycle is in place, you can focus on making sure it fits seamlessly with your existing systems and objectives.

Alignment with your systems and objectives

Alignment with your systems and objectives ensures electrical PPM strengthens your governance instead of creating side‑systems. Every organisation has its own mix of CAFM, document management and golden thread tools, so All Services 4U matches output formats and data structures to those systems and agrees meaningful KPIs that keep work visible within your existing assurance framework.

All Services 4U:

• Adapts output formats and data structures so they can be taken straight into your existing platforms.
• Works with your information and compliance teams to define naming conventions, metadata and version‑control rules from the outset.
• Agrees performance indicators that matter to you, such as EICR pass rates, remedial backlog reduction and repeat defect trends, rather than only counting how many jobs are “completed”.

This approach makes us easier to onboard and less disruptive to your established ways of working.

With delivery and integration covered, the remaining question is how you maintain assurance and keep residents informed as defects are found and resolved.

---

Assurance, Governance and Resident‑Focused Close‑Out

Assurance for electrical safety in HRBs depends on more than technical tasks; it relies on how you track findings, record decisions and communicate with residents. Assurance comes from closed‑loop governance and clear communication as much as from engineering, so you can show how serious findings are tracked to completion, how difficult decisions are recorded and how residents are kept informed, keeping your Safety Case and reputation robust when tested.

A strong Safety Case depends as much on governance and communication as it does on engineering. Electrical regimes that look sound on paper can still fail if defects are not controlled, decisions are not recorded and residents are left in the dark about what is happening and why.

Closed‑loop handling of EICR and PPM findings

Closed‑loop handling turns serious electrical findings into managed actions with owners, deadlines and evidence of completion. Serious electrical observations should move through a defined, auditable path so that, for every C1, C2, FI or critical C3, you can show when it was raised, what was done, who verified it and how learning was shared across your estate.

Serious electrical observations should move through a defined, auditable path:

• Each C1, C2, FI and safety‑critical C3 is logged with a unique identifier and linked to a specific asset, location and EICR.
• A responsible owner and target timescale are allocated according to risk.
• Remedial works are recorded against the same identifier, with evidence such as certificates, photographs or test sheets.
• A verification step confirms that the risk has been controlled and, where appropriate, that similar issues have been checked elsewhere.

All Services 4U can either plug into your existing governance workflows or provide standardised action‑tracking tools that make this path visible and manageable.

Decision logs and ALARP reasoning

Decision logs and ALARP reasoning help you explain why particular recommendations were deferred, re‑scoped or accepted as residual risk. By recording who decided, on what basis and for how long the decision stands, you turn implicit compromises into explicit, reviewable choices that can be revisited as circumstances change.

Not every recommendation can be acted on immediately. What matters is that:

• Decisions to defer, downgrade or accept residual risk are recorded with clear reasoning.
• The people making those calls have appropriate authority and competence.
• Periodic reviews check whether earlier decisions remain appropriate.

A simple decision log, kept alongside your EICR and PPM records, can make the difference between “we do not have an explanation” and “here is why we took this course of action at that time” when questioned by auditors or the Regulator.

Resident communication as part of electrical safety

Resident communication supports electrical safety by improving access, reducing anxiety and showing that risks are being managed, not ignored. Clear, plain‑language updates on planned works, outages and outcomes help create cooperation for inspections and reduce the likelihood of complaints and escalations.

Electrical work can be intrusive and unsettling if it is not explained. A resident‑focused approach:

• Gives advance notice of planned works, outages and access needs, in clear, non‑technical language.
• Explains briefly how the activity links to legal duties and the goal of keeping people safe.
• Provides clear contact routes for questions and for reporting any concerns after the work.

All Services 4U can support your resident teams with template letters and briefing notes that fit your organisation’s tone and branding.

Once residents, boards and regulators can all see how electrical work is found, fixed and explained, the final step is to decide how you will start improving your current regime.

---

---

Book Your Free Consultation With All Services 4U Today

All Services 4U gives your team a practical route from “electrical compliance on paper” to a regulator‑ready regime that integrates EICRs, PPM and Safety Case evidence for your higher‑risk buildings. A brief consultation focused on a representative HRB can highlight where your current approach is strong, where it is exposed and what a more robust electrical regime would look like in practice.

In that consultation, you can:

• Walk through a recent EICR, remedial history and PPM schedule together and see how they would read in a Safety Case context.
• Review a sample electrical evidence pack, including policy extracts, task matrices, action logs and mapping into Safety Case sections.
• Explore practical options for piloting an integrated electrical PPM and EICR programme on one or two buildings before deciding on a wider roll‑out.
• Discuss how outputs would integrate with your existing CAFM, document management and golden thread systems, so you are not adding another silo.

If you are an Accountable Person, asset lead, compliance manager or building‑services lead responsible for HRBs, a free consultation with All Services 4U is a low‑friction way to test whether this approach fits your organisation. If you have a Safety Case submission, FRA review or insurer survey approaching, booking that conversation now gives you time to adjust your regime before questions are asked.

It gives you a concrete pack to take back to your board and a clearer benchmark for what “regulator‑ready” electrical PPM looks like for your buildings. When you are ready to move away from box‑ticking and towards genuine, evidence‑backed control of electrical risk, that is the moment to start the conversation.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore our FAQs to find answers to planned preventative maintenance questions you may have.